 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

|
 |
| JANUARY
2000 |




Herd Health:
Biosecurity
Biosecurity and Calf Disease Management
By Greg
Quakenbush, DVM
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Pfizer
Animal Health, the manufacturers of Bovi-ShieldTM,
CattleMaster®, Rumatel®, and Liquamycin® LA-200®, is proud
to sponsor the Animal Health section of DairyBiz. Our inaugural
month will introduce our HerdSecureSM biosecurity initiative.
Pfizer recognizes that sound biosecurity practices protect
your reputation, your way of life and your herd's potential.
That's why we developed HerdSecure, an educational program
to help you implement a sound biosecurity management program.
Secure a Healthy, Productive Herd. By implementing a few
simple, common sense practices, dairy producers can succeed
at biosecurity. To help out, Pfizer Animal Health developed
HerdSecure. HerdSecure is a biosecurity initiative based
on three principles, animals, people and programs that offer
you the most return for your effort.
Find out more about how HerdSecure can help you by visiting
this page each month. Begin now by reading the following
reprint written by Dr. Greg Quakenbush, Senior Technical
Service Veterinarian, Technical Service-Cattle and start
your journey of learning practical concepts that you can
implement in your operation.
|
If a milk producer was asked where s/he experienced the most
illness and death on the dairy, the most common answer would
have to be 'in the calves', especially those less than four
weeks of age. With this in mind, several other questions need
to be asked:
- Why the higher level of illness and death among calves?
- Are those losses expected or considered a routine part of
the dairy business?
- Does calf care and management have a lower priority than
other management areas on the dairy?
While
the answers to the above questions will vary between producers,
the facts suggest that calf mortality (death) in the average
dairy runs anywhere for 5.1% -20.2%. Most of these deaths will
occur during the first month of life. If these numbers seem
high, then the number of calves that become ill (morbidity)
during this period must be even higher.
Calf Growth
Rate
While many producers
judge the success of their calf raising by the percentage of
those that survive to weaning, a better measure of success might
be to consider the growth rates of the calves. In the case of
replacement heifers, growth rate ultimately affects the timing
of puberty, which affects the age of first lactation (24 months
vs.28 months), and even first lactation milk production.
When
the age of first lactation and milk production come into the
picture, the economic impact of calfhood diseases takes on a
new meaning. While no uniform data is available, it is generally
recognized that calf diseases ultimately set the calf back in
regard to growth rate and often create chronic conditions that
will never allow the animal to reach its full genetic potential.
These previously sick (but recovered) calves may lag behind
healthy herdmates by weeks or even months. In addition, if their
illness was severe enough or long standing, permanent damage
and/or chronic pain may be present which will ultimately results
in these animals becoming economic liabilities.

|
|
 |
|


|
 |
|
 |
Calf Health
Management
The bottom line regarding
calf health is that management factors do influence the illness
and death rates of calves. Too many producers have come to accept
these high rates as routine or acceptable, not fully realizing
the economic cost may be much more than just the value of a dead
calf or increased veterinary and drug costs -- especially in those
animals that survive this risky development period.
Biosecurity
Program Principles
A more obvious situation
for the implementation of a biosecurity program would be hard
to find. Let's review the principles of a biosecurity program
as previously covered in this series, and apply these principles
to the dairy calf.
Disease
comes about from the interaction of three primary components:
the animal, the pathogen (disease-causing organism), and the
environment. The basic concept of a biosecurity program for
the dairy addressed these three components in this manner:
- Raise the level of resistance
in the current dairy population.
- Reduce the exposure of the herd
to on-site diseases and pathogens.
- Control and monitor all cattle,
livestock, equipment and people entering the dairy.
Success
in maintaining herd health requires that all three components
be addressed simultaneously. Ignoring any one area is all that
is required to allow disease to gain the upper hand and create
economic losses.
Calf Biosecurity
Our biosecurity program
adjusted to the unique situation and needs of the calf would
include the following recommendations:
1. Raise
the Level of Resistance in the Dairy Calf (Animal, Environment)
- Colostrum and colostrum management
- Dry cow management and cow vaccinations
- Nutrition
- Reduce environmental stressors/increase
calf comfort
2. Reduce
Exposure of the Calves to On-site Disease and Pathogens
Calves are born
with essentially no antibodies and an immature, non-fully functional
immune system. Human babies born into this situation would undoubtedly
be placed into a special sterile environment to reduce the chances
for contracting disease. Calves however, are thrown into the
sea of infectious agents found in and around the mud, urine,
feces, flies, and sick animals that reside in their surroundings.
The following list contains some common sense suggestions that,
if followed, will greatly decrease the exposure of the calves
to disease organisms and improve their health, survivability
and growth rates.
- Clean teats before the calf
nurses or before milking out colostrum.
- Filter colostrum to remove
any fecal matter (pasteurization of colostrum is often beneficial).
- Utilize individual hutches
and thoroughly disinfect between occupants.
- Keep maternity pen clean and
freshly bedded.
- Separate calves from dams as
soon as possible, and move the calf to an individual hutch.
- Keep calves away from
other members of the herd, avoiding calf-to-calf contact.
- Add more bedding or move hutches
to decrease exposure to infectious agents.
- Pay strict attention to sanitation
measures. Thoroughly clean and disinfect all equipment that
comes in contact with calves. When applicable, each calf should
have her own dedicated feeding utensils. Feeding buckets should
not have scratches (plastic) or other rough surfaces that
allow bacteria to reside in them.
- Isolate sick and diseased calves,
feeding them last.
- Keep water sources, feeds,
etc. free from manure contamination.
3. Control
and Monitor all Cattle, Livestock, Equipment, and People Entering
the Dairy
Part of the strategy
of a biosecurity program is to keep infectious agents from entering
the dairy in the first place. As previously discussed and supported
by NAHMS data, most dairies fall short in this regard and leave
themselves open to receiving someone else's problems. While
a truly closed dairy may seem undesirable or impractical, the
health benefits are undeniable. Just attempt to walk onto most
major swine rearing facilities. The swine industry has recognized
the benefits of biosecurity measure and has aggressively implemented
them.
|
|
 |

The bottom line regarding calf health is that management factors
do influence the illness and death rates of calves. |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |

Unlike human babies, calves are
born with essentially no antibodies against disease-causing organisms. |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
| Pictured here, Dr. Gregory
Quakenbush, D.V.M,.Technical Services, Pfizer Animal Health |
Colostrum
Management
Unlike human babies,
calves are born with essentially no antibodies against disease-causing
organisms. Human babies will receive antibodies while still
in the womb via the mother's bloodstream. Calves do not receive
antibodies from their mother's bloodstream, and instead they
rely on colostrum to provide the antibodies that are critical
for disease resistance and protection. This process of getting
antibodies from the colostrum is known as passive transfer.
If adequate amounts of colostrum are not received within a certain
time frame, or if the quality of the colostrum is poor, then
the calf will not receive adequate antibodies. This low or absent
antibody transfer from the colostrum to the calf is known as
failure of passive transfer (FPT). As an example of the critical
nature of this passive transfer, the University of California-Davis
Veterinary Medical Extension states that a calf which receives
no colostrum is 74 times more likely to die than calves receiving
colostrum by the recommended method.
Most
dairy producers realize the importance of colostrum, but surveys
continue to show that colostrum management often falls short
of what is necessary for maximal transfer of antibodies. Good
colostrum management depends primarily upon three factors: timing
of administration, volume of colostrum administered, and colostral
quality. For Holstein calves the recommended colostrum program
is to hand administer (via bottle or stomach tube) four quarts
of colostrum within two hours of birth, followed by another
two quarts of colostrum around eight hours post-calving. The
initial four-quart colostrum feeding is most important and becomes
even more critical if the quality of the colostrum is not known.
Timing
of colostrum administration is critical because the small intestine
can only absorb the large antibody protein molecules for a matter
of hours. For the first nine hours following birth, the ability
of the intestine to absorb antibodies into the bloodstream has
decreased by 50%. By 24 hours, the small intestine is essentially
closed to large molecules and no antibody transfer can take
place.
Hand
administration of colostrum is important to ensure that an adequate
volume of colostrum is administered within the critical time
frame. Surveys reveal that 30% of dairies allow the calf to
remain with the dam for up to 12 hours and nurse colostrum on
their own. Studies in these situations have shown that only
25% of calves receive an adequate volume of colostrum to provide
passive transfer. This leaves 75% of calves at risk of failure
of passive transfer and are therefore more susceptible to disease
and/or death.
Dry
Cow Management and Cow Vaccinations
Antibody content and
colostrum quality can be greatly affected by management of the
cow during the dry period. Colostrum quality is going to be
directly proportional to the immune status of the cow. Anything
that affects immunity of the cow will be reflected in the quality
of the colostrum. If the cow is under stress, or if forage quality
is low, then colostrum quality will suffer. However, vaccinations
of the cow three to four weeks before freshening will often
result in increased antibodies in the colostrum and may be considered
a way to vaccinate the calf (i.e.. through the colostrum).
Vaccinating
the dry cow for E. coli, Rotavirus, Coronavirus and Clostridium
perfringens may help in the management of calf diarrhea. Respiratory
viral vaccines administered to the dam containing IBR, P13,
BRSV and BVD can reduce the incidence and/or severity of these
diseases in the young calf. Keep in mind that vaccination of
the dam during the dry period does not guarantee calf health,
but it will help to provide the calf with high antibody colostrum.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
| Pictured here, Dr. Victor
Cortese, D.V.M,.Technical Services, Pfizer Animal Health |
Calf Nutrition
It goes without saying that the calf's resistance
and disease incidence levels will be greatly affected by nutritional
management of the calf. Quality of milk replacer, introduction
of calf starter rations, maintenance of caloric intake during
cold weather and/or illness, and availability of fresh water
are just some of the nutritional issues that need attention.
Keep in mind that we want to obtain an overall growth rate of
at least one or more pounds per day during the pre-weaning period.
By the time calves are weaned they should be gaining 1.5 pounds/day.
Consider utilizing growth rates in addition to survivability
as a measure of your calf raising success. Calf and young heifer
growth rates ultimately relate to the first lactation milk production.
Reduce
Stress and Improve Calf Comfort
Stress plays a large
role in reducing resistance levels of individual animals and
therefore makes them more susceptible to disease and even death.
For example, calves that undergo a difficult birth requiring
assistance (pulling) are 4.2 times more at risk of becoming
ill and/or dying than a calf undergoing a normal unassisted
birth. Every effort should be made to look for stressful situations,
eliminate them and supply tender loving care. Common types of
stress experienced by many calves include uncomfortable, cramped
housing; poor ventilation; drafty environments; inconsistent
feeding practices; and heat or cold.
Treatment
vs. Prevention
The whole purpose
of a biosecurity program is to reduce the incidence of illness
and disease, protect the resident herd, and increase profitability.
The goals of such a program ultimately rely upon preventive
measures rather than treatment to reduce the incidence of illness
and the spread of disease.
In
no other part of the dairy operation can the results of a biosecurity
management program be more readily appreciated and the positive
results more rapidly observed than with calves. Dramatic reductions
in calf death and illness rates are available to producers who
are willing to increase the level of attention that successful
calf-raising requires. Producers who rely on treatment alone
in their battle against calf disease are always going to be
greatly disappointed. An ounce of prevention, in this case,
is truly worth a ton of cure.
|
|
 |
  |
|
 |
  |
 |
| Dr. Quakenbush holds
the title of, "Senior Technical Service Veterinarian, Technical
Service-Cattle" with Pfizer Animal Health. This article was
submitted by Pfizer Inc. with permission granted by Pfizer. If
you need further information regarding this article, please contact
Pfizer Animal Health at 1.800.829.5589.
This article reproduced with permission from Midwest Dairy
Business.
|
 |
|
 |
  |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|

©2002, MooMilk.com. Designed and built by Tommy Dew Design, Inc.
|
|
|
|