|
Mastitis
discussions inevitably split the issue into sub-clinical and
clinical mastitis and generally the emphasis then goes towards
explaining how sub-clinical mastitis is the major cause of
reduced production, elevated SCC, inferior milk quality, etc,
etc. All of this is well documented and true!
However,
few issues are more upsetting to dairymen than fighting case
after case of clinical mastitis with more and more cows in the
sick pen. It represents extra time to properly handle such cows,
lost production, vet calls, treatment products, concern about
contaminated milk and an occasional dead or culled cow. Clinical
mastitis is a highly visible problem and generally produces the
impression something has gone wrong. It causes dairies to
question everybody and everything including milking equipment,
milking procedures, teat dips, housing and the weather.
Clinical
Mastitis Symptoms
You
generally will know it when you see it. Typically during the
pre-milking routine, visual observation of noticeable changes in
milk such as flakes or clots in foremilk samples is how it is
spotted. Fore-milking can provide valuable information about
each cow. Milk may also
appear watery or have an off-white color. Often changes in milk
characteristics are associated with more general observations
such as a hot, hard quarter, sensitive to touch. In other cases
these symptoms are absent.
Examination
of milk filters after milking also can be an indicator. The
presence of slime and clots on filters indicates clinical cows were
milked but that milk is now in the tank.
The
relationship between any of these visual characteristics and the
specific type of bacteria responsible is generally weak.
Culturing milk samples from infected cows is the best tool to
determine the species of organisms involved in a clinical case
but be cautious with results. Always involve a veterinarian
familiar with interpreting milk culture reports to help assess
the situation and determine an appropriate course of action.
Clinical
Samples -- No Growth Culture Indication
Culture
results may produce confusing information. Various studies have
indicated 25-40%
of clinical case milk samples result in a bacteriological
finding of “No
Growth." This doesn’t seem possible but it happens
and there are explanations. Milk samples may contain such low
concentrations of bacteria that culture procedures cannot detect
them due to lack of test sensitivity. Increasing the sample
volume tested may help. The cow may have been treated with
antibiotics before sampling and the bacteria are dead. Possibly
the animal’s system eliminated most of the bacteria prior to
sampling or sample handling may have been inappropriate and
killed the bugs. Regardless, it is possible and quite common for
milk samples, from cows suffering obvious clinical mastitis, to
produce a “No Growth” culture result.
Clinical
Mastitis -- Related Factors
Cows
and first calf heifers develop more clinical mastitis at
dry-off, around calving and early lactation so there is a stage
of lactation affect.
Certain
bacteria species are more likely to be associated with clinical
outcomes than others and there also appears to be an association
between season, climate and parity and clinical problems. The
hot weather of late spring, summer and early fall tends to be
associated with more clinical cases.
Benchmarks
-- What’s Normal
Clinical
mastitis may be inevitable, the key is to minimize the incidence
rate. Written guidelines frequently suggest clinical cases
should represent less than 2% of the milking herd/month or 2
cows/100 cows milked per month. Despite this guideline, analysis
of numerous published reports indicates a rate of 3-3.5% is
quite common.
Be
careful with the numbers. Clinically infected cows may be repeat
offenders and a single cow may account for multiple clinical
cases. Such cows require special consideration. Looking only at
cows developing new
clinical infections, in a defined timeframe, helps eliminate the
bias of repeat offenders.
Organisms
Involved
Mastitis
causing bacteria produce very different rates of clinical
mastitis. Coliform and environmental Strep infections tend to be
associated with relatively high incidence rates of clinical
mastitis. It is estimated 40-50% of all environmental Strep
infections result in clinical mastitis so this particular
organism group can be a major headache in terms of the clinical
consequences. Staph aureus on the other hand is more likely to
produce chronic, sub-clinical mastitis with occasional clinical
flare-ups, often associated with periods of stress.
|